How to tell an authoritarian populist? They trash institutions

Stephen Gwynne says

20th February 2018 at 9:53 am

I think the dichotomy between illiberal democracy and undemocratic liberalism is needlessly exaggerating both populism and liberal reformism to the point of propaganda.

As I see it we are seeing a cultural split within liberalism in the form of communitarian liberalism which tends towards a national focus on rights and responsibilities and national democratic self-determination in terms of socio-cultural, socio-economic and socio-ecological public policies and cosmopolitan liberalism which tends towards international rights and responsibilities and international technocratic self-determination in terms of socio-cultural, socio-economic and socio-ecological public policies.

The former, communitarian liberalism, tends to be captured by a more populist/conservative/socialist leaning electorate and the latter, cosmopolitan liberalism, tends to be captured by a more liberal reformist leaning electorate.

Each type of liberalism has its own interpretation on issues such as stagnating living standards, fears of multiethnic democracy and the rise of social media as a vehicle for propaganda and collaboration along the continuum between communitarian and cosmopolitan value systems which produces different representations/performatives of freedom, autonomy and popular will.

These different representations/performatives are currently operating within a field of national/international realism and are creating the perception of crisis in the form of of a cultural war with liberal reformists imagining illiberal democracy and proponents of populism/conservatism imagining undemocratic liberalism.

Obviously foreground concerns around multiethnicity, migration, living standards and the wealth divide are driving this socio-cultural divide but I’d also add increasing resource scarcity, human population growth and surplus energy economics within a world of nations where half are already in ecological debt are similarly important background concerns which contextualise the foreground concerns that are driving the divide.

At present, within the context of national/international realism, liberal reformists are trying to drive institutions towards cosmopolitan laissez-faire socio-cultural, socio-economic and socio-ecological public policies which are being opposed by communitarian populists, conservatives, socialists, conservationists and democrats which is leading towards an unproductive propaganda war.

At the end of the day, we must think start thinking ecologically about these wide-ranging foreground and background issues, especially regarding decisions around institutional capacity. In other words, we do not want to continue causing unnecessary problems simply for the sake of political ideology.

Peter Arnold says

20th February 2018 at 1:13 pm

Whilst I agree with the broad thrust of this article, I have to disagree with some of the details. In the first place, the UK is not a functioning democracy; it is, at best, an elective bureaucracy. Yes, we have elections, and governments of different persuasions assume power peacefully, but by no stretch of the imagination can it be claimed that any of them accurately reflect the wishes of the people. It is an adversarial, eighteenth century system, based on a “winner takes all” principle, even though the winner, more often than not, has received an absolute minority of the votes cast. Secondly, very few of our decision-making bodies at either local or national levels operate democratically, ie : there is a full, free and open debate of any issue after a full, free and open consultation with people directly affected before any decision is made. Thirdly, very few of our national institutions are organised or run democratically. Education, particularly in schools, is at best a benign dictatorship; very little of business or industry is run democratically; none of our emergency services are democratically organised or run; nor is the health service. Bureaucrats run the UK, not the politicians, and certainly not the people. That is why, in my opinion, we need fundamental reform of the whole constitutional and governmental structure, to open them up to genuine scrutiny and democratic control. If the UK has any success in any of its activities, it will not be the result of any governmental or institutional action; it will be down to the activities of individual citizens in their communities, to civil society, to the charities and community groups who know what people in their communities need; and they will be successful precisely because they operate outside the formal structures of government. They have the power to introduce fundamental change where it is needed to improve the quality of life for people, and they do this far more successfully than any government of any party political persuasion has been able to do for the last fifty years at least. Let’s stop tinkering with the current broken system, and replace it with a genuinely democratic system that is fit for the twenty-first century.

Comments

Stephen Gwynne says

20th February 2018 at 9:53 am

I think the dichotomy between illiberal democracy and undemocratic liberalism is needlessly exaggerating both populism and liberal reformism to the point of propaganda.

As I see it we are seeing a cultural split within liberalism in the form of communitarian liberalism which tends towards a national focus on rights and responsibilities and national democratic self-determination in terms of socio-cultural, socio-economic and socio-ecological public policies and cosmopolitan liberalism which tends towards international rights and responsibilities and international technocratic self-determination in terms of socio-cultural, socio-economic and socio-ecological public policies.

The former, communitarian liberalism, tends to be captured by a more populist/conservative/socialist leaning electorate and the latter, cosmopolitan liberalism, tends to be captured by a more liberal reformist leaning electorate.

Each type of liberalism has its own interpretation on issues such as stagnating living standards, fears of multiethnic democracy and the rise of social media as a vehicle for propaganda and collaboration along the continuum between communitarian and cosmopolitan value systems which produces different representations/performatives of freedom, autonomy and popular will.

These different representations/performatives are currently operating within a field of national/international realism and are creating the perception of crisis in the form of of a cultural war with liberal reformists imagining illiberal democracy and proponents of populism/conservatism imagining undemocratic liberalism.

Obviously foreground concerns around multiethnicity, migration, living standards and the wealth divide are driving this socio-cultural divide but I’d also add increasing resource scarcity, human population growth and surplus energy economics within a world of nations where half are already in ecological debt are similarly important background concerns which contextualise the foreground concerns that are driving the divide.

At present, within the context of national/international realism, liberal reformists are trying to drive institutions towards cosmopolitan laissez-faire socio-cultural, socio-economic and socio-ecological public policies which are being opposed by communitarian populists, conservatives, socialists, conservationists and democrats which is leading towards an unproductive propaganda war.

At the end of the day, we must think start thinking ecologically about these wide-ranging foreground and background issues, especially regarding decisions around institutional capacity. In other words, we do not want to continue causing unnecessary problems simply for the sake of political ideology.

Log in to Reply
Peter Arnold says

20th February 2018 at 1:13 pm

Whilst I agree with the broad thrust of this article, I have to disagree with some of the details. In the first place, the UK is not a functioning democracy; it is, at best, an elective bureaucracy. Yes, we have elections, and governments of different persuasions assume power peacefully, but by no stretch of the imagination can it be claimed that any of them accurately reflect the wishes of the people. It is an adversarial, eighteenth century system, based on a “winner takes all” principle, even though the winner, more often than not, has received an absolute minority of the votes cast. Secondly, very few of our decision-making bodies at either local or national levels operate democratically, ie : there is a full, free and open debate of any issue after a full, free and open consultation with people directly affected before any decision is made. Thirdly, very few of our national institutions are organised or run democratically. Education, particularly in schools, is at best a benign dictatorship; very little of business or industry is run democratically; none of our emergency services are democratically organised or run; nor is the health service. Bureaucrats run the UK, not the politicians, and certainly not the people. That is why, in my opinion, we need fundamental reform of the whole constitutional and governmental structure, to open them up to genuine scrutiny and democratic control. If the UK has any success in any of its activities, it will not be the result of any governmental or institutional action; it will be down to the activities of individual citizens in their communities, to civil society, to the charities and community groups who know what people in their communities need; and they will be successful precisely because they operate outside the formal structures of government. They have the power to introduce fundamental change where it is needed to improve the quality of life for people, and they do this far more successfully than any government of any party political persuasion has been able to do for the last fifty years at least. Let’s stop tinkering with the current broken system, and replace it with a genuinely democratic system that is fit for the twenty-first century.

Log in to Reply

System renewal. Challenging established notions. Reimagining our societies.

System renewal. Challenging established notions. Reimagining our societies.

How to tell an authoritarian populist? They trash institutions

Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

The Author

Latest Related Work

Real radicalism depends on some engagement

A formal Lib-Lab pact? That’s the last thing we need…

Democracy is not a morality play

Jubilee report: What a strange nation we live in!

The great American strategic clarification

Follow Us

POST TYPES

RECENT ACTIVITY

CONTACT US