I am an American, keep the government out of my life, and particularly my pocket.


Many around the world have seen the now classic ‘Marlboro Man’ cigarette advertisements. This man is a real man, strong, rugged and capable of taking care of himself. If he is married, he is a family man, focused on protecting and providing for it ,no matter what.

When he falls, he picks himself up ,dusts himself off and continues in his endeavours. He is a doer and he never gives up.

This Marlboro Man construct may seem like a cartoon character but, to millions of Americans, is what the American Character is all about. He is John Wayne, Joe Dimmagio and General MacArthur rolled into one, always confident , never displaying weakness or doubt, and always coming through. Women admire his strength and can-do attitude and children want to be like him. He is the American Hero.

Critically,Marlboro Man does not depend on others. He expects to make his own decisions and choices, to survive and thrive by his own wits and hard work. He expects to retain and benefit from the fruits of his labor and expects all others to do the same.

Often,Marlboro Man sees success and overcoming adversity as a competitive sport, a zero sum game, where he wins and someone else loses.

He is particularly suspicious of government and sees their role as needless, self serving bureaucratic interference more than anything else.

This view applies particularly to distant government, the federal government that does not understand or cater to the specific needs of his community. The Feds, and to a lesser degree state government, bring little in the way of value but make rules that get in the way of his freedom to make choices and succeed or fail by them.

Taking his hard earned money and redistributing it to unnamed others without his explicit consent is particularly hard for Marlboro Man to accept.

This construct ,alongside the fact that, uniquely amongst nations, Americans judge each other on character and accomplishment rather than social class, tribe ,taste or religious affiliation, is what Americans refer to as individualism.

To state the obvious, this definition of Individualism is devoid of ,and in many ways contrary, to any concept of the common good, a societal perspective that means we will all do better if the more able offer a leg up to others via taxation, government programs or handouts.

Importantly, this does not mean that Americans are not generous or compassionate – quite the contrary. Americans will offer their neighbour a helping hand and give to charity more than the nationals of any other country.

The caveat is that they themselves, of their own free will, are making the decision to help or make a charitable donation  to support an individual, specific cause or organisation. And when it comes to charitable donations, a tax deduction is an additional incentive.

It should not come as any surprise that given these deeply entrenched views, the social safety net embraced by other developed nations is viewed as both flawed and dangerous. Flawed because it is non-discretionary and, since it is handled by nameless government bureaucrats,  likely to be wasteful and open to abuse. Dangerous because even short term help may lead to demotivation and dependency, both UnAmerican .

Tiding someone over, even during a temporary setback, may be enough to stop them looking after themselves and start relying on or worse, developing a sense of entitlement, to government handouts.

The idea of  government  help funded via taxation is therefore anathema to many Americans. Such benefits do not represent a direct return on one’s individual efforts and as such are demotivating and to be avoided. Add to that the  belief that the beneficiaries are disproportionately minorities and you get the thinly veiled overlay of racism to complete the picture.

The resulting controversies surrounding the funding of social security (a “state pension”, the amount of which depends on lifetime contributions) and Medicaid (a partnership between the federal and state governments to provide free or heavily subsidised healthcare to the poor) in particular therefore reflect a US culture which has not evolved to reflect many of the current realities affecting all Americans.

The path to the American Dream is no longer on a level playing field. Relevant skills and knowledge matter more than ever and need to be continuously updated and enhanced to enable the same living standards. And global competition makes attainment of such standards that much harder to begin with.

Americans’ attitude to welfare is an obvious, but not the only indicator that culture lags reality, often becoming maladaptive. New winning formulas at both the individual and collective levels necessitate acknowledgement of fundamental change and are therefore slow to emerge.

Help us lay the intellectual foundations for a new radical politics. Sign up to get email notifications about anything new in this blog. See also our new book: Backlash: Saving globalisation from itself.

Rate this post!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Radix is the radical centre think tank. We welcome all contributions which promote system change, challenge established notions and re-imagine our societies. The views expressed here are those of the individual contributor and not necessarily shared by Radix.


  1. Peter Arnold says

    Marlboro Man is also a typical American male in other ways too – he is always white, taciturn because he has little to say, and emotionally immature. This is not my European view. It is the view of an intelligent, compassionate and experienced American-born man whose view of his own upbringing is that American men must appear to be mature (Marlboro Man) even though the vast majority of them are anything but (Donald Trump). John Wayne’s characters rarely apologised for anything they said or did, and they usually said little because they couldn’t cope with complex human beings who might have views of their own which were different from their own. Their problem-solving strategy was usually to shoot first and to ask questions afterwards, a strategy that appears to be popular with white American policemen, particularly when they are dealing with people of colour. Donald Trump, in this sense, is representative of this view, because he cannot cope with dissent, he speaks before he thinks, and his all-American belief in the power of the dollar to solve every problem betrays his fundamental ignorance of the real world that exists outside of his cloistered White House door.

Leave a Reply

The Author
Latest Related Work
Follow Us