The core of the radical centre – it’s education…


“Education, education, education,” said Tony Blair in 2001 as he set out the key tenets of New Labour in the UK after almost two decades in opposition. Yet, in power, he failed to do very much to improve educational standards across the board in the UK.

Much has been written about why Britain voted for Brexit 18 months ago, with more and more statistical evidence pointing to a likely correlation between levels of education and voting patterns in that referendum. Brexit, and the election of Donald Trump, may be signs of what happens when a democracy fails to sufficiently educate its citizens in political awareness.

So why is education core to the radical centre and its success in the coming generation? And how can we make nsure that citizens support the efforts of the radical centre?

The answer is obvious, and twofold.

First, the radical centre is at heart deeply democratic. It eschews demagogues, autocrats, and those who abuse democracy. It has a fundamental belief that most citizens are smart, balanced and sensible – and that a democratic vote will generally lead to a good government.

Yet this premise assumes that enough citizens with the vote are sufficiently aware of socio-political matters, sufficiently informed to develop their own independent views, and that they can tell the difference between a balanced, reasonable argument and populist hyperbole, scaremongering or prejudice. In short, democracy, as understood by the radical centre, requires a level of socio-political education and awareness.

Secondly, the radical centre is not in the business of the left or right wing demagogues, and ‘populists’ who shout slogans they think enough of the public might like to hear and that could get them elected. The radical centre does not provide simplistic answers to complex problems like national identity, immigration, globalisation, security. Its responses are balanced, intelligent, sensible and radical in thought and action. Not just headlines for the media.

As such, again, the radical centre relies on a broad level of education among the citizens to appreciate its arguments.

In much of Northern and Western Europe, democracy is understood to be fragile and valuable. Memories of the Second World War, not to mention the odd revolution, run deep. It is understood that democracy requires the support of the state in the form of a good general level of education for the citizenry, not just in academic subjects, but in understanding the rights and obligations of citizens – and that one of those obligations is to be informed, to a degree, about the socio-political issues facing the country.

It isn’t enough in those countries that a small elite is highly educated, because that is not a guarantor of democracy or of a good, balanced democratic debate. It is not surprise that the centre often does well in countries like Germany, Netherlands and Denmark, with their high levels of education and parliamentary system supporting coalition government.

Which brings us back to a key issue for the radical centre in the UK, where I live. It is self-evident that there is a problem in a country where seven per cent of the population receive a truly world-class education, equipping them not only to lead their own country but also internationally, and where those seven per cent make up about half of the senior judiciary, one third of all members of parliament and almost half of the ruling party – while the educational chances of the remaining 93 per cent of the population depend on the fortune of their location, whether there are good schools locally, perhaps selective schools.

I have heard calls for private and public schools in the UK, serving those seven cent, to be somehow curtailed, even abolished. Of course this misses the point. These schools, providing a world-class education to the seven per cent of the population whose parents can afford it, are successful service providers.

They are excellent businesses, receiving £15,000 per pupil per year and upwards and providing, as a return on investment, an unparalleled education, networks and contacts. What any future British government must focus on, if it wants to strengthen democracy and give the ailing centre ground a fresh chance, is the standard of education for the remaining 93 per  cent.

Standards of education for ‘the masses’ should not be a lottery of postcode location or happenchance. Nor is it sufficient to teach them basic academic subjects. If we want to turn the general citizen into an active, educated, aware contributor to democracy, we must not shy away from educating in political discussion, dialogue, debate, the rights and obligations of the citizens.

There is a reason why the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and others seem more developed, and more centred, in their political consciousness. The answer lies perhaps in the approach of the seven per cent towards the 93 per cent.

Help us lay the intellectual foundations for a new radical politics. Sign up to get email notifications about anything new in this blog.

Rate this post!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Radix is the radical centre think tank. We welcome all contributions which promote system change, challenge established notions and re-imagine our societies. The views expressed here are those of the individual contributor and not necessarily shared by Radix.


  1. nigel hunter says

    Schools should not be classed as businesses. This implies some succeed better than others (the7%). A level playing field should be set up for the other 93%. As long as the system remains, that 93% will be subjects of the 7%. Education should be taken out of politics.

  2. Peter Arnold says

    I agree that democracy is part of the core of the radical centre. In my view, however, it is the only core principle, because what we are about is the creation of a truly democratic society. Education has an important role to play, but it is not the core. The trouble is, as a society, we talk as if we were a democracy, but the reality is very different. Why? It’s simple. In our structures and practices, we reject democracy in favour of bureaucracy and autocracy. Look around you. Are our families run as practising democracies? Our schools? Businesses? Government? In none of these structures are democratic principles allowed to flourish. Age, wealth and background run this country, not the people. And the powers that be do not have to pass any educational tests to get a grip of the levers of power, so let’s forget the idea that only those who can prove they understand the complexities of the issues facing individuals, families and communities should have a role in society. We need to start practising what we preach. If we believe in democracy, then let’s use it at every level of society. In the UK today, the limited powers granted to individuals and local government may be small, but they are sufficient to begin the process of change. I know this is the case because of my experience as a former councillor. I achieved very little by simply following the bureaucratic line. I achieved a great deal more by starting with the people experiencing local difficulties. Listening to their complaints, opinions and suggestions was and is a sobering experience. Working with them to achieve a consensus and a practical outcome was liberating and immensely satisfying. Proving the “experts” wrong was even better. There’s nothing like a healthy dose of democracy in action to release the enthusiasm and creativity of local people. And it’s infectious, because local government officials also caught the bug some of the time, and real, sustainable outcomes would often follow. Let’s use the powers we already have as citizens, tax payers and local residents to introduce the habits of democracy, real, practical democracy, into our communities. Only then will radical change begin to happen, and once it does, then what a glorious opportunity opens up to create a better future!

Leave a Reply

The Author
Latest Related Work
Follow Us